Sitat tb77:PS! You do NOT want FriFlyt to test and review your skis. ... Cause there is no doubt in my mind that your skis would be butchered in such a test.
Sometimes I do not know what you are talking about!I WANT FRIFLYT TO TEST OUR RAX SKIS.
Friflyt would not be the first ski forum to test them.An independent report on Rax ski was written by "DB" inhttp://snowheads.com/ski-forum/viewtopic.php?t=35246
The report on this English forum ends with:The Rax ski enables you to 'turn on a sixpence', Tom could put in a few turns on the track or the soft snow above it to slow down. Tom would probably go straight down the fall-line to the side of where you skied though....I consider (Rax ski) as a quiver ski for certain conditions. Conditions that would be skiable on a normal ski but not without risk.At first I was on the front of the Rax ski or I should say on the front half of a very short ski. Was expecting to headbutt the floor and loose a few teeth at any moment but it didn't happen. As the day went on Í became more comfortable and more centered on the ski. The turning radius is very short and so avoiding people is easier. Tom was able to dart all over the place with little effort whereas the longer turning radius of my normal skis made it much harder work. When the piste was busy I had to back off whereas Tom was off like a rabbit scared by a shot. In steep wet snow conditions the Rax ski is probably safer. I only fell twice, once during my unexpected backflip and once when the ski caught something underneath (this could of happened on a normal ski too). People around me were going down more times than Monica Lewinsky. When skiers/boarders collide it tends to be body parts and not skis that do the damage. The fins aren't as sharp as normal ski edges and I didn't come away thinking "wow these things could really do some damage".
